July 2009

Return to
[ Home | Home Cinema ]

Home Cinema

 by Leonard Heldreth

A closer look at some Academy Award nominees
All of the films this month were nominated for multiple Academy Awards, and some won. Three of the films examine the effects of doubt and guilt on their characters, while the fourth presents the end of a professional athlete’s career.

Doubt
Although first staged in 2004, just after the church scandals about sexual abuse became public, John Patrick Shanley’s Pulitzer and Tony award-winning play is set in 1964, just after the Kennedy assassination and when the Catholic Church was experiencing the reforms of Vatican II and the nation was realizing the depths of the Vietnam difficulties.
Certainty was hard to find at that time. The location is St. Nicholas Catholic High School in the Bronx, which Mr. Schenley attended. The author, also a veteran screen writer (Moonstruck) and director, has adapted his play to film (shortening the title from Doubt: A Fable) and directs.
Four main characters are involved in the conflict. Father Brendan Flynn (Philip Seymour Hoffman) is the typical young Irish priest—intelligent, shrewd, reliable and a strong believer in the church hierarchy as well as the reforms of Vatican II. The principal of the school is Sister Aloysius Beauvier (Meryl Streep), a narrow-minded, sadistic nun who believes in the old ways and who does not hesitate to use any means to consolidate and preserve her power. Caught between these two is Sister James (Amy Adams), a young nun teaching at the school.
The immediate problem is Donald Miller (Joseph Foster II), the sole black student in the school. Serving as an altar boy, he has been caught drinking the sacramental wine. Sister James mentions to Sister Aloysius that Father Flynn has taken more interest in Donald than circumstances would justify, in her opinion, and she saw Father Flynn put an undershirt in Donald’s locker. Sister Aloysius immediately concludes that Flynn is having improper relations with the boy, and she sets out to have him removed. Their confrontations and the exploration of the case against Flynn make up the rest of the film as the two slug it out. Is Father Flynn guilty? Is he gay? Why has he left three parishes in five years? Why is Aloysius willing to lie to convict him?
One of the best scenes is between Sister Aloysius and Donald Miller’s mother, played to perfection by Viola Davis. Only after Donald’s mother presents his side of the story do some of the reasons for his behavior begin to fall into place. Rather than go public and face the charges, Flynn leaves, but that’s not the end of the story. Throughout, doubt hangs over all of the characters, who question their own and others’ actions, except for Sister Aloysius who is certain she is right.
All four major actors were nominated for Academy Awards, although Streep’s performance was criticized by a number of reviewers as being a caricature rather than a character. Davis stole the show in her brief scene, and it’s hard to argue with the other performances.
Doubt is a film that maintains the intellectual and moral questions of a good stage play, but Shanley never opens it up adequately for a good film—he just does the obvious. Streep and Davis talk as they walk along a sidewalk rather than in her office, and the last scene is set in a snow-covered garden at the school. The play talks of a wind that is blowing, and the film shows Streep leaning into a gust of leaves and wind as she walks back to the school. There is little translation into cinematic terms. But, given the strength of the play, perhaps that’s not necessary. It still emerges as a powerful film that leaves viewers asking questions after the credits roll, and, in view of recent revelations about the treatment of children by religious organizations in Ireland, the subject clearly still is relevant. Doubt received Academy Award nominations for Best Actress (Streep), Best Actor in a Supporting Role (Hoffman), Best Supporting Actress (Davis and Adams) and Best Adapted Screenplay. Top


The Reader
Stephen Daldry’s previous film, The Hours, was praised for its elegance and criticized for its lack of passion; The Reader has received a similar response. Like the earlier film, The Reader deals with abstract qualities, perhaps even more of them than The Hours, and its weight of guilt, shame, and emotional withdrawal give it a cerebral quality that causes many film-goers, even the intellectuals who claim to want “serious” films, to whine about its “bloodless” quality.
The Reader, based on the best-selling 1995 German novel of the same name by Bernhard Schlink, carries with it the experience of the Holocaust, although it takes place well after that event.
Although the screenplay jumps about in time with flashbacks within flashbacks, the original novel followed a chronological order. In 1958 in Neustadt (Germany), fifteen-year-old Michael Berg (David Kross), on his way home from school, hides from the rain in an alley and throws up, not realizing he is coming down with scarlet fever. Hanna Schmitz (Kate Winslet), a thirty-something woman who lives upstairs, cleans him up, comforts him in a perfunctory way and sends him on home. During his illness, Michael’s mother tells him that when he recovers, he should thank the woman who helped him, and some months later, he stops by her apartment and does that. Through various circumstances, Hanna and Michael end up in bed together, and during the summer they have a passionate affair, one that entails his reading to her before they have sex, hence the title. Hanna works as a streetcar ticket collector, but that is all Michael knows about her. One day, he returns to her apartment to find it empty and her gone. Although he doesn’t know the reason, the audience knows that she has been offered a promotion from being a conductor to working in an office job, and for reasons not clear at the time, she flees. Many reviewers speculated about why she left Michael, but she didn’t leave because of him—she left because she could not take the better job and could not explain why.
In 1966, Michael, now studying law under Professor Rohl (Bruno Ganz of Wings of Desire), attends a trial of Nazi war criminals and is horrified to find Hanna on trial as an S.S. guard who was responsible for selecting people for extermination in the death camps. Watching the progress of the trial, he realizes he has information that can ameliorate her sentence, although she refuses to reveal the information herself.
Over the remaining years until 1995, the end of the novel, Michael (now played by Ralph Fiennes) records audiotapes of books and sends them to Hanna, but refuses to visit her. At the end of the film, he does meet with her in prison and, at her request, delivers a package to Ilana Mather (Lena Olin), a Holocaust survivor in New York City.
Winslet won an Oscar for her performance as Hanna, and the win was justified. Hanna is a difficult character because the audience never sees inside her. All that is known is what she says and does, and what others say she did. Further, Winslet has to walk the narrow line between first, generating undue sympathy for this woman who sent women and children to their deaths and second, creating a monster that would be a cliché. She succeeds. She also makes understandable Hanna’s mental limitations (she’s not mentally handicapped, just uneducated and not very bright) in a way that makes believable her accepting a job at death camps and accepting orders of her superiors. Kross is remarkably good as Michael, and Ralph Fiennes, with his cold-fish withdrawal from life, is exactly right as the older Michael.
The film, like the novel, explores the question of guilt, both personal and collective, and examines the differences in response to the Holocaust between two generations of Germans, exemplified by Hanna and Michael. The film raises many questions and provides few answers, as does the Holocaust itself, but it’s a powerful film that is fascinating. The early scenes have extensive nudity, some frontal, and simulated sexuality; these scenes were not filmed until after Kross turned eighteen. Kross, by the way, did not know English until he started preparing for this, his third feature film. The Reader received Academy Award nominations for Best Picture, Best Actress (Winslet won), Best Director, Best Cinematography and Best Adapted Screenplay. Top


Frost/Nixon
While film adaptations of stage plays and novels are common, Peter Morgan created his successful stage play by adapting the original Frost/Nixon videotapes for a theatrical presentation. When that was successful, he wrote the screenplay, and veteran director Ron Howard guides the film version of the British stage hit. Frank Langella and Michael Sheen repeat their stage roles as Nixon and Frost.
David Frost’s original interviews with Richard Nixon, covering nearly thirty hours, occurred in May 1977, three years after Nixon became the first President to resign from office; the material was edited down to four ninety-minute segments for broadcasting. Frost persuaded Nixon to do the interviews by giving him $600,000 plus ten percent of the profits. Because Frost had trouble pre-selling the interviews, he fronted the money, and, had he failed to secure an interview he could market, he would have had great financial and professional losses. At the time, Frost was a successful interviewer and talkshow host, but he was not considered a tough journalist capable of getting Nixon to confess to wrong doing. Nixon apparently saw the interviews as not only a chance to refurbish his financial situation, but clean up his disgraced image through adroit statements and a sympathetic stance. For most of the interviews, Nixon got exactly what he wanted, but in the Watergate interview, Frost brought Nixon as close to confessing as anyone was able to do. It’s a powerful moment.
In the play and its film adaptation, Frost’s ability as an interviewer is deliberately played down in order to increase the suspense: Is this a man who can handle “Tricky Dick” Nixon? Time also is spent on the negotiations and the mechanics of setting up the interviews, but since the original tapes are available on videodisc, Peter Morgan was limited to condensing and emphasizing certain parts of the debate to the exclusion of other parts. The only clearly fictionalized section is a phone call that Nixon makes to Frost late one night after the ex-President had a few drinks. Like the recent attempt to explain W’s failings by the pressure his father put on him, Nixon tries to convey to Frost how excluded he felt all his life and how difficult it was for him to be as sociable as a politician has to be. It’s an interesting call, although Nixon later questions whether he actually made it.
Langella and Sheen are excellent as the two leads, although Langella tends to steal the show (as Nixon always tried to do). While he captures Nixon’s intelligence and deception nicely, he’s almost too suave himself to totally capture Nixon’s strained social skills and inability to handle the unscripted moment. He seems far more couth and in command than the real Nixon ever did. Sheen, having played Tony Blair twice in The Deal and The Queen, is used to being the underdog in the acting competition, and he’s quite capable of holding his own against Langella and Mirrin.
The sets and supporting cast are copied as closely as possible from the original tapes, and the DVD includes some cuts showing the original people and their stage counterparts doing the same lines. Ultimately, how most viewers will feel about Frost/Nixon will depend on how they feel about Nixon. Some reviewers saw Nixon as once again escaping the prison term he so richly deserved, while others saw some element of Shakespearean tragedy in his mistakes and fall.
As the country today discusses whether to prosecute members of the Bush administration or to pardon their errors and move on—as Gerald Ford pardoned Nixon—a look back at the Nixon era can be enlightening as well as a little scary, especially when Nixon says, “When the President does it, that means that it is not illegal.” Frost/Nixon received Academy Award nominations for Best Picture, Best Director, Best Actor (Langella), Best Editing and Best Adapted Screenplay. Top

The Wrestler
Darren Aronofsky has made the offbeat indie film Pi, the award-winning Requiem for a Dream; and the puzzling and commercially unsuccessful science fiction film, The Fountain. He acknowledges his fourth film, The Wrestler, is an attempt at a new start, even though the idea had been in his head for several years. Although he originally planned to have Mickey Rourke in the lead role, he found that casting the controversial actor made raising money for the picture more difficult, and switched to Nicholas Cage. Then he found financial support in France and, by reducing his budget, he was able to use Rourke. The results have justified his vision, for the film and its cast have won Golden Globes, San Francisco Film Critics awards and Academy Award nominations.
The plot is simple—a mixture of the Rocky pictures and Requiem for a Heavyweight, as well as the other films and television shows about washed-up professional athletes. Randy “The Ram” Robinson once was a top draw in the professional wrestling circuit, filling Madison Square Garden in a match with his nemesis, the Ayatollah. But twenty years after his glory days, Randy is wrestling in high school gyms and other makeshift arenas; he struggles financially, barely getting along on his cut from the matches each weekend; health problems from old injuries plague him. About a third of the way into the film, after a bloody and physically demanding match, he has a heart attack and wakes up in the hospital. The doctor says Randy has no choice—he has to give up wrestling or he will die. But for Randy, wrestling is his life—he lives for the sound of the crowd, the applause of his fans and the camaraderie with the other wrestlers. The Ram knows he has screwed up his life—“I deserve to be alone,” he says at one point—but he refuses to be angry or bitter at finding himself down and out.
He talks the problem over with one of his best friends, a stripper named Cassidy (Marisa Tomei), and she suggests that he try to reestablish a relationship with his teenaged daughter Stephanie (Evan Rachel Wood). The rest of the film follows Randy as he tries to talk to his daughter, establish a better relationship with Cassidy and decide whether to stay retired or to risk one last match against his old rival, the Ayatollah, to make some money.
To get in shape for the part, Rourke worked out for six months and gained thirty-five pounds of muscle to top 230 pounds; with his long bleached-blonde hair and steroid-enhanced physique, he certainly looks the part (think Hulk Hogan), and he makes the scenes with Wood and Tomei believable and touching. Cassidy the stripper, like Randy, is a performer past her prime; like him she uses a stage name, and she also has a child. Cassidy tries to keep Randy at a professional distance, but she cannot resist going to see one of his matches. Tomei’s performance gives credence to the old cliché about the stripper with the heart of gold, but the script gives little justification for her actions.
The film does not try to glorify Randy. He keeps repeating mistakes he has made in the past, and although he seems to make a breakthrough with his daughter as the two dance in an abandoned arena, she realizes he will never change. Reviewers emphasized the similarities between the comeback wrestling attempt of Randy Robinson and the comeback acting career of Mickey Rourke. Rourke sums it up when he says of his character, “Randy wants one more chance, and he ain’t gonna get it. I’ve been lucky. I got another chance.”
Viewers interested in professional wrestling will enjoy the behind-the-scenes view of the sport, as the wrestlers discuss who will be the bad guy and what holds they will use. The moves may be choreographed, but the injuries are real. The Ram hides a razor blade in his wrappings so that he can draw blood from his forehead during a match. The Wrestler was nominated for Academy Awards for Best Actor and Best Supporting Actress (Tomai). Top
—Leonard G. Heldreth

 

Editor’s Note: All films reviewed are available on DVD or VHS from local stores.


[ Home | Home Cinema | Top ]


The on-line versions of articles from the current month are usually truncated - look for an ellipsis ( . . . ).
The full version appears in the print edition of the Marquette Monthly and next month in the on-line archives.

Obtain your own free copy of the Marquette Monthly at one of our MM Distribution Outlets
or purchase your own annual subscription, which will be delivered by U.S. Mail.

Marquette Monthly:
the Central U.P. source for entertaining stories, local culture & events - a trusted community friend

Copyright 1999-2010 * Site Comments? Web Design